Here’s an interesting question making its way around the World Wide Web: If you didn’t have to worry about the administrative tasks with SQL Server, would you consider using SQL Server as a service?
There’s talk that it’s not much different from a hosted SQL Server at your ISP. It’s an issue of control, I suppose. Some people get spooked by the notion of transitioning to a fully hosted SQL solution. The discussion started at Stephen Wynkoop’s site, but let’s continue it here.
Is SQL Server in a fully hosted form a good idea, or would it cause issues no one has yet to mention?
ServerPronto offers the world’s most affordable Microsoft SQL dedicated severs. Microsoft SQL is available on all of our dedicated hosting packages with prices ranging from $128.95 a month to $348.95 a month. Click here to learn more about SQL dedicated servers.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed